Friday, June 26, 2009

Michael Jackson: The Imperfect Man, Myth, and Legend


No need for me to announce the death of Michael Jackson. The world certainly knows this by now.

I made a comment on Twitter and Facebook regarding his death that has bothered some of my friends and acquaintances, while inspiring others to deeper thought on the subject.

My statement? "Michael Jackson's cause of death? Heart loses rhythm. The height of irony."

I meant this on many levels.

A. To offer a slight amount of humor in light to the drama of the day.
B. Tossing out a twist on the announced cause of death: Arrhythmia, which is literally a loss of rhythm.
C. Making a statement on Michael himself, whose career certainly jumped the tracks, hitting successive wrong notes for the last 15 years.

I hear people calling him a pedophile and a tortured genius. Comparisons have been made to Van Gogh and Beethoven. Others say he was sick and twisted. More say he wasted his potential, and tainted his legacy.

No one truly knows, but the man himself, and the boys who were involved with him over the years in whatever sense, whether he was a pedophile. His own admission of letting children into his bed is certainly not proof, but also not the norm.

His money management skills seems in question, with $400 million of debt apparently left in his wake. His business acumen often appeared sharp, from his dealings with Pepsi and Disney to his purchase of the Beatles library. Yet he far outspent his fortune, and left many in a lurch for millions. How and why may justify or vilify him, as the years go by.

I hear that his actions were a result of his childhood - an oft-used excuse in this era of shifting responsibility and lack of accountability for one's choices. Michael made his choices - and had to live with the consequences. His choices were simultaneously shrewd and naive, and his results were similarly disparate.

His generosity and love for children was evident, and he often chose to use his position to benefit others, though motives were brought into question. The same forces promoted and reported on both.

Michael Jackson prospered and suffered at the hands of his family, the public, the media, and by his own choices in regard to each. To say he was tortured and sad is as much of a speculative judgment as saying he was a twisted, freakish, pedophile.

His music - oh his music. Listening to it in the Heartland of Iowa was at once embarrassing and titillating. Songs like Beat it and Billie Jean were not for the faint of heart, particularly from my church upbringing. But Thriller? Amazing. I remember going over to my Grandparents house because they had cable, and making them turn it to MTV so I could watch it. My Grandma was horrified at the sight and sound of MJ's gyrating zombies. Thriller was among the first 2 or 3 cassettes I ever bought, along with Billy Joel and Lionel Richie.

His music was as conflicted as his life. To hear "Bad" alongside "Heal the World" was as schizophrenic as pictures of him at 25 vs.45. The seemingly biographical "Leave Me Alone" seemed to say it all, though through his choices he made it impossible for us to actually do so.

Was he a genius? Certainly. Did he change music forever? Absolutely. Did he inspire millions, including myself? Without a doubt.

Was he imperfect? Of course. Did he make choices that turned him into the butt of jokes and a harbinger of confusion, fear and doubt? Unquestionably.

He was clearly out of sync with most others, both positively and negatively. Those that achieve greatness usually are. Some are deemed madmen, others dreamers. Many are unable to handle their own greatness, or grasp their own power. Others just look to escape.

Whether his heart was out of rhythm with his family, his fans, the press, his God, or himself is something I cannot judge. But I can learn. I can observe the public choices he made, and decide for myself how it affects my own choices, and how I feel about him.

When we choose to live by our own rhythm as opposed to the often drowning beat of others walking in step to their day to day drudgery of mediocrity and misery, we must also choose to deal with the consequences. There are many in my own life that do not understand the choices I make. They can't imagine living in pursuit of a dream instead of on a treadmill of quiet desperation. I'm OK with that - and how I handle my choices in light of those perceptions is crucial.

Michael's death came when his heart lost rhythm. Michael's life was lived with a heart that possessed its own unique rhythm. Ultimately, it will not only be our genius that is remembered, but our choices along the way, that will be judged. Be a Champion of Choice, and be prepared.

Sunday, April 5, 2009

Inspiration without Perspiration is subject to Evaporation


A friend of mine loves to run races - seems like once a week I read of his latest adventure. I told him his perspiration provides me with inspiration. One of my goals is to get in good enough shape to try this prosthetic out in a real 5 or 10K run.

I've had this goal for nearly 3 years. Truthfully, it hasn't been much more than that. I've gained weight, and I'm further away than ever from running.

The goal is evaporating - turning to gas and merging with the unrealized dreams of billions around the world. When you look into the air around you, visualize the evaporated dreams floating there: dream vacations, new cars, paid mortgages, passionate marriages, happy families. Everyday dreams seem to slip through the fingers of the masses.

What's your big idea? Which dreams are you ready to perspire for? By taking action, even small steps, you ensure your Inspiration does not suffer Evaporation. If it's truly your dream, be willing to sweat it out to the final tape.

Make your Choice, and be a Champion.

Friday, December 12, 2008

Do You Crave Feedback?

Most of us don't. Most of us just want to do something, receive accolades, and move on. In absence of accolades, we'll accept silent acceptance. Certainly, we almost always wish to avoid the dreaded 'constructive' or 'not-so constructive criticism' of our employers, co-workers, clients, spouses; whoever is involved in the process with us.

Its easy to hear both benign suggestions and harsh criticisms as the same thing: an attack on what we've done - in the case of speaking, often an attack on what we believe and who we are, not just how we sound.

I've worked with clients who are scared to get in front of an audience, as well as those who can 'WOW' an audience - both are capable of climbing to a higher level by learning to crave feedback - to accept that they have someplace better they want to go, and be willing to hear the truth it takes to get them there.

For those that put the sheet over the mirror, or jealously work to maintain the status quo in order to stay 'under the radar', their consequences go beyond just not getting better at their chosen pursuit. Sooner or later (usually sooner), they fall behind the curve, not only failing improve, but deteriorating.

As a speaking coach I take feedback even as I give feedback. I coach individuals from their starting point, not my own. In the past week, I've evaluated three projects that couldn't be more diverse, working with personalities of three distinctly different types. I give feedback, I get feedback, I give more feedback based on their feedback - and improvement happens in leaps instead of steps.

Friday, December 5, 2008

The Origin of New Foot Smell


In 2006, I needed to write a speech for a District Competition in Toastmasters that covered Eastern Washington and Northern Idaho. The event took place 4 weeks after my amputation. I felt I had to address the situation, without creating a speech which made my audience feel sorry for me.

I developed "Live Your Legacy" which took the story of my Grandfather's preoccupation with leaving a specific legacy with my doubt I could leave a strong legacy if I was unable to walk. When I discussed the surgery, I used terms such as 'upgrade', 'super-deluxe robot leg', and celebrated my solution, my 'New Foot Smell'.

This speech, along with 8 others from myself, 2006 World Champion Ed Hearn, and 2nd place winner Douglas Wilson, is compiled, with background information on our journey to the World Championship of Public Speaking, in our book Win Place & Show.

In December, I'm running a special on the book - with it comes a Video of me performing at the next level, still in a wheelchair, but with the same positive humor that got me there in "Live Your Legacy".

Buy a copy for yourself, your friends, or the guy walking down the street, at http://www.richhopkins.net/WinPlaceShow12.htm!

Monday, November 24, 2008

Is Public Speaking Back in Style


Fellow coach Lisa Braithwaite found this article online - Presidentially Speaking: 59% Say Public Speaking is Back in Fashion suggesting public speaking is back in style!

It outlines a survey of 1700 anonymous USA voters who felt the abilities of President-Elect Barack Obama vs. the ability of Sen. John McCain in the public speaking arena weighed heavily on their choice of whom they would elect.

The conclusion of the article is that 'Public Speaking is Back in Style' - that poor speakers are now held to a higher standard than they have been in years. Whether our presidential election was decided by public speaking is not 100% sound theory - but it certainly had an effect.

Quality public speaking goes beyond keeping your 'ahs & uhms' under control. Physical delivery, facial expression, vocal control, word choice, and authenticity all impact the effectiveness of your communication.

Have you ever heard a bad speech? Have you ever given one? I know I have - and it has driven me to improve my own skills, and dedicate a significant portion of my career to helping others improve theirs.

What will YOU do to ensure your next speaking opportunity, to your employees, stockholders, or association hits the mark? If public speaking is back in style, you may be called to speak sooner than you think!

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

Why Drive When You Can Walk?

Two of my kids started a new school today. Well, actually, same school, brand-new building! No longer needing to be bussed, they get walked to the school in the morning, and walked back when done.

This is a ton of walking for my wife - who has to drop both off, then walk one home at noon, the other at 2:45. So I thought we'd go pick the older one up by car. Upon arrival, my 2nd grader was down - she wanted to WALK home! So I dropped off my dear wife, and they walked while I drove.

Walking wasn't the bad choice for my daughter. She didn't care that it was cold, that it took longer, or that it required actually using muscle. She saw it as a chance to be outside, be with mom, and have fun.

Do you ever look at the oft considered bad ways to do things for their benefit? Taking the long route? Enjoying the journey, the process?

Its so easy to speed through the tasks of daily living. Before we realize, we've sped all the home.

Sunday, September 7, 2008

The Spin of Perspective

Yesterday, the 15th ranked Brigham Young Cougars escaped with a win over the struggling Washington Huskies in Seattle. After Washington quarterback Jake Locker rushed into the end zone for a game-tying touchdown with 15 seconds left, he joyously threw the ball straight up into the air as he was mobbed by excited teammates.

Unfortunately, his youthful spirit violated the new anti-celebration rules, causing him to be flagged for unsportsmanship. The new rules cover everything from planned celebrations to slash-the-throat gestures to, apparently, spontaneous displays of joy.

A look at the actual NCAA rule:

Rule 9/2
2. After a score or any other play, the player in possession immediately must return the ball to an official or leave it near the dead-ball spot. This prohibits:
(a) Kicking, throwing, spinning or carrying (including off of the field) the ball any distance that requires an official to retrieve it.
(c) Throwing the ball high into the air.
been called.

This moved the ball back 15 yards for the extra point, which BYU skillfully blocked, and this wonderful college game was denied the chance of reaching legendary status in the annals of overtime.

Instead, the papers today are all talking about the rules, the officials who could have overlooked the call, the dynamics of a longer extra point, etc.

For my purposes, lets talk public relations from the standpoint of the BYU coach. After the game he said that "But I do know this: throughout the entire game, there were all kinds of [celebratory] plays on both sides," he said. "That [one] was the most visible. But celebration is a penalty. Whether it was or not, I didn't see it, but if it was, it should have been called. Even if it was on our team, it should have been called; the rules are the rules.". Fair enough - a safe stance that avoided calling the other team a bunch of celebrating whiners.

BUT - what if......

What if Coach Bronco Mendenhall had come out with some righteous anger on the side of his opponent? Said "its a shame the officials made that call" and "It takes what could have been a classic memory for both sides and turns it into yet another game severely impacted by officials".

He'd won the game. His kids did what they had to do, block a long extra point, which still should have been an easy make for the Huskies. But to show frustration for his opponent, to empathize with the plight of Jake Locker, who didn't do anything more than be happy to score, how many points would Coach Mendenhall have scored for himself and his University. He may have been fined by the NCAA for criticizing the officials - but he can afford it.

The reward would have been the ultimate in sportsmanship: showing empathy for ones opponent, and championing the spirit of college football - if the not the letter of the law.